Methods of advancing education in the interests of sustainable development
Abstract
The essence and basic principles of the concept of sustainable development, features of its adaptation to domestic social and economic conditions are considered in work. Emphasis is placed on the certainty of sustainable development as the only possible way to solve environmental problems on a global scale. Education is one of the critical goals of sustainable development and a means to achieve it. In getting an education, people must learn to meet their own needs without compromising the needs of future generations. Fulfilling modern education tasks to form individuals capable of acting within the sustainable development strategy is possible subject to its radical renewal and modernization. Today it is not enough to learn the "old", the "famous", to reproduce the "experience of generations". Education must prepare the individual for new challenges, for the future. So – to be anticipatory and prognostic. The purpose of advancing education for sustainable development should be the development of highly educated, creative individuals capable of constantly updating professional knowledge; introduction of modern pedagogical technologies that allow increasing the adaptation of graduates to the perspective needs of the labor market. The main principles of advancing education are as follows: integrativity, variability, regionalization, creativity, acmeology, fundamentalization, continuity, rationality. Advancing education, taking into account its purpose, should be based on methods aimed at stimulating the cognitive activity of the learner, the development of mental abilities, skills, and needs of self-learning. Such practices include problem-based learning, interactive, developmental, and the project method.
References
Aynutdinova, I. (2010). Advancing education in a higher education in the humanities: theoretical foundations. Almanac of modern science and education, 3 (34) part 1, 117-121.
Azizov, A. & Akinshina, N. (2009) Education for Sustainable Development. National Commission of the Republic of Uzbekistan for UNESCO.
Bazavlutskaya, L. (2018) Sustainable Development Goals in Education: Features and Problems of Implementation. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 9 (6), 19-35 https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2018-6-19-35
Brown, L. (2003). Ecoeconomics: How to Create an Economy that Protects the Planet. The Whole World.
Bucket, O. V. (2017). The teachings of VI Vernadsky on the noosphere as a basis for innovative support for environmental development of regions (nooregions). Scientific notes of Tavriya National University named after VI Vernadsky, 28/67 (1), 5-11.
Decree of the President of Ukraine "On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine until 2030" №722 / 2019 (2019). https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/7222019-29825.
Dixon, J. (2003). A new look at the wealth of nations. Indicators of environmentally sustainable development. The Whole World.
Grinyova, M. V. (2017). VI Vernadsky's doctrine of the noosphere is the basis of modern natural science. Image of a modern teacher, 3/1 (172), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729-2017-3/1(172)-48-54
Karpan, I. (2012). Education for sustainable development: conceptual principles and experience of implementation [dis. Cand. philos. Sciences, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education]
Khaustova, V. Ye., Omarov, S. A. (2018). The concept of sustainable development as a paradigm of society. Problems of Economics, 1 (35), 265-273.
Khmelevska, O. M. (2018) Education for sustainable development: content and institutions. Demography and Social Economy, 1 (32), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2018.01.029
Kitaygorodsky, M.D. (2007). Advanced education. Aspect approach. Science and school. 6, 3-5.
Komarova, O. (2011). Features of the formation of the advanced level of educational potential of society. Economic Journal-XXI, (9-10), 57-60.
Koreneva, I. M. (2018) Education for sustainable development: the realities of Ukraine. Bulletin of Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University named after Oleksandr Dovzhenko, 36, 17-25.
Kovaleva, T.N. (2007). Education for Sustainable Development: Information and Analytical Review. MGEU.
Levkivsky, K. (2007). Education for sustainable development. Higher school: scientific and practical edition, 5, 17-26.
Lyashuk, K. P. (2020). The concept of sustainable development as a basis for corporate social responsibility in the business environment of Ukraine. Problems of the system approach in economics, 1 (75), part 1, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2020-1-17
Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J. & Behrens W. W. (2004). The Limits to Growth. The 30-year Update.
Mruz, A., Osetkevich, I., & Tomchik, L., (2020). Sustainable development in secondary school curricula. Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 1, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-182-204
Nepeina, G.V. (2009). Education for sustainable development: origins and prospects. Scientific works of the Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy complex, Vol. 112, № 99, 20-24.
Nikolaev, K.D. (2015). Advancing education for sustainable development as an innovative form of organizing the educational space for teacher training. Scientific notes of the National Pedagogical University. MP Dragomanova. 126. 116-124.
Novikov, A.M. (2002). The idea of advancing education. Education World - Education in the World, 3, 171-197.
Pometun, O. I. (2015) Pedagogical principles of education for sustainable development in the Ukrainian school. Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 1, 171−182.
Ridkodubskaya, G. A. (2017). Case method in the process of preparation for professional mobility of future social workers. Collection of scientific works of Kherson State University. Pedagogical Sciences, 80 (2), 246-250.
Subetto, A.I. (2010). The theory of fundamentalization of education and universal competences (noospheric paradigm of universalism). Asterion.
Sustainable Development Goals: National Report 2017 (2017). https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/uk/home/library/sustainable-development-report/sustainable-development-goals--2017-basseline-national-report.html.
Sysoeva, S. O. (2002). Personally oriented pedagogical technologies: project method. Continuing professional education: theory and practice, Scientific and methodical journal, 1 (5), 73-80.
Tomaszewska, M. (2017). The use of interactive teaching methods in the training of future teachers in higher education. Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovative technologies. 8, 178-188. https://doi.org/10.24139/2312-5993/2017.08/178-188
United Nations General Assembly Resolution "Rebuilding our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" № 70/1 (2015).
Ursul, A.D. (2012). Towards Advanced Education. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts. 3 (31), 130-133.
Vyshkivska, V., & Shykyrynska, O. (2021). Interactive teaching methods: features and peculiarities of use. Grail of Science, (2-3), 502-504. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.02.04.2021.101
Vysotska, O. (2012). Advancing education for sustainable development: methodology, techniques, technologies. "Accent PP".
Vysotska, O. (2015). Advancing education for sustainable development: theoretical and methodological principles. Director of school, lyceum, gymnasium. All-Ukrainian scientific-practical journal, 1-3, 103-107.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future Report https://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf
Yavorska, ST (2004). A new look at old problems (before the analysis of teaching methods). Pedagogy and Psychology, 1 (42), 124-135.
Zagorsky, VS, Borschuk, EM (2020). Civilizational paradigm of sustainable development. Efficiency of public administration. 3 (64), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.33990/2070-4011.64.2020.217621
