Psychological component of surrogate motherhood in the light of commodity market development

Keywords: surrogacy; children's rights; psychological well-being.


Surrogacy is a popular practice, one of the types of assisted reproductive technologies aimed at helping childless couples in their desire to raise a healthy child. The modern information space has formed in surrogate mothers a set of ideas that surrogacy is a harmless, socially positive practice, an instrument of sacrifice that can help people solve their life problems. These theses are supported by a number of scientific studies that demonstrate the absence of any destructive psychological consequences for surrogate mothers. However, the results of this study suggest that such notions of surrogacy are only fragmentary and do not take into account the close biological, physiological and emotional closeness of the surrogate mother-child, which is formed during pregnancy and lasts until the end of life. This undermines the established paradigm of looking at the surrogate mother as an isolated "container" that has nothing to do with the child. As a result, surrogacy is presented as an immoral practice, and the alienation of the child becomes a form of commodity relations. In such circumstances, the moral feelings of most surrogate mothers about the services they provide are often unrealistic, fragmentary and illusory, as they do not take into account a number of factors that indicate a close relationship with the child and, consequently, the commodity nature of the relationship with "customers".


Alouini, S., Mesnard, L., Megier, P., & Desroches, A. (2010). P45 Ethical and legal aspects of surrogate pregnancy: opinion of French women on surrogate pregnancy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20, S38.
Baslington, H. (2002). The Social Organization of Surrogacy: Relinquishing a Baby and the Role of Payment in the Psychological Detachment Process. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(1), 57–71.
Bhatia, K., Martindale, E. A., Rustamov, O., & Nysenbaum, A. M. (2009). Surrogate pregnancy: an essential guide for clinicians. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 11(1), 49–54.
Blake, L., Carone, N., Slutsky, J., Raffanello, E., Ehrhardt, A. A., & Golombok, S. (2016). Gay father surrogacy families: relationships with surrogates and egg donors and parental disclosure of children’s origins. Fertility and Sterility, 106(6), 1503–1509.
Carone, N., Baiocco, R., & Lingiardi, V. (2017). Italian gay fathers’ experiences of transnational surrogacy and their relationship with the surrogate pre- and post-birth. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 34(2), 181–190.
Council of Europe., & Council of Europe. (1952). The European convention on human rights. Strasbourg: Directorate of Information.
Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion. (2013). Fertility and Sterility, 100(3), 645–650.
DasGupta, S., Dasgupta, S. D., Nayak, P., Bailey Illinois State University, Alison, Madge Jawaharlal Nehru University, Varada, Pande University of Cape Town, Amrita, Majumdar, A., Rudrappa, S., Mohapatra Barry University School of Law, Seema, Tyson Darling Adelphi University, Marsha J., Feinberg, A., & Maisel, J. (2014). Globalization and Transnational Surrogacy in India: Outsourcing Life. Lexington Books.
Deonandan, R. (2015). Recent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: ethical considerations and challenges for policy. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 111.
Dunlop, A. L., Jack, B. W., Bottalico, J. N., Lu, M. C., James, A., Shellhaas, C. S., Hallstrom, L. H. K., Solomon, B. D., Feero, W. G., Menard, M. K., & Prasad, M. R. (2008). The clinical content of preconception care: women with chronic medical conditions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(6), S310–S327.
Fischer, S., & Gillman, I. (1991). Surrogate Motherhood: Attachment, Attitudes and Social Support. Psychiatry, 54(1), 13–20.
Golombok, S., Blake, L., Casey, P., Roman, G., & Jadva, V. (2012). Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(6), 653–660.
Grodin, M. A. (1991). Surrogate motherhood and the best interests of the child. Women’s Health Issues, 1(3), 135–137.
Imrie, S., & Jadva, V. (2014). The long-term experiences of surrogates: relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 29(4), 424–435.
Jacobs, S. (2018). Biologists’ Consensus on “When Life Begins.” SSRN Electronic Journal.
Jadva, V. (2003). Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers. Human Reproduction, 18(10), 2196–2204.
Jadva, V., Gamble, N., Prosser, H., & Imrie, S. (2019). Parents’ relationship with their surrogate in cross-border and domestic surrogacy arrangements: comparisons by sexual orientation and location. Fertility and Sterility, 111(3), 562–570.
Johnson, L. (2019). Commercial surrogacy is the sale of children? An argument that commercial surrogacy does not violate international treaties. Washington International Law Journal, 28(3), 701–726.
Kamper-Jørgensen, M., Biggar, R. J., Tjønneland, A., Hjalgrim, H., Kroman, N., Rostgaard, K., Stamper, C. L., Olsen, A., Andersen, A. M. N., & Gadi, V. K. (2012). Opposite effects of microchimerism on breast and colon cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 48(14), 2227–2235.
Karandikar, S., Gezinski, L. B., Carter, J. R., & Kaloga, M. (2014). Economic Necessity or Noble Cause? A Qualitative Study Exploring Motivations for Gestational Surrogacy in Gujarat, India. Affilia, 29(2), 224–236.
Klonisch, T., & Drouin, R. (2009). Fetal–maternal exchange of multipotent stem/progenitor cells: microchimerism in diagnosis and disease. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 15(11), 510–518.
Lepez, T., Vandewoestyne, M., & Deforce, D. (2012). Fetal microchimeric cells in blood and thyroid glands of women with an autoimmune thyroid disease. Chimerism, 3(1), 21–23.
Loike, J. D. (2013). New Ethical Horizons in Gestational Surrogacy. Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology, 01(02).
Montrone, M., Sherman, K. A., Avery, J., & Rodino, I. S. (2020). A comparison of sociodemographic and psychological characteristics among intended parents, surrogates, and partners involved in Australian altruistic surrogacy arrangements. Fertility and Sterility, 113(3), 642–652.
Nelson, J. L. (2012). The otherness of self: microchimerism in health and disease. Trends in Immunology, 33(8), 421–427.
Pavlovic, Z., Hammer, K. C., Raff, M., Patel, P., Kunze, K. N., Kaplan, B., Coughlin, C., & Hirshfeld-Cytron, J. (2020). Comparison of perinatal outcomes between spontaneous vs. commissioned cycles in gestational carriers for single and same-sex male intended parents. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(4), 953–962.
Pizitz, T. D., McCullaugh, J., & Rabin, A. (2013). Do women who choose to become surrogate mothers have different psychological profiles compared to a normative female sample? Women and Birth, 26(1), e15–e20.
Ragoné H. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO, and Oxford: Westview Press/Basic Books, 1994.
Riddle, M. P., Michaud, S. C., Redden, Q. D., Pozza, O. R., & Scanlan, B. L. (2019). The psychological impact of surrogacy on the families of gestational carriers: implications for clinical practice. Fertility and Sterility, 112(3), e378–e379.
Rosner, M., & Hengstschläger, M. (2013). Amniotic fluid stem cells and fetal cell microchimerism. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 19(5), 271–272.
Sibal, K. (2016, September 11). Unequal by law. The Indian Express. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from
Snowdon, C. (1994). What Makes a Mother? Interviews With Women Involved in Egg Donatfon and Surrogacy. Birth, 21(2), 77–84.
Söderström-Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U. B., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomäki, K., Romundstad, L. B., & Bergh, C. (2015). Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, dmv046.
Southern Surrogacy LLC. (2021, February 11). Does a Surrogate Mother Share DNA with the Baby? Southern Surrogacy. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from
Teman, E., & Berend, Z. (2018). Surrogate non-motherhood: Israeli and US surrogates speak about kinship and parenthood. Anthropology & Medicine, 25(3), 296–310.
UA:Перший. (2021, November 28). Торговці мріями: як працює сурогатне материнство в Україні? | Фільм-розслідування Суспільного. YouTube. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from
United Nations. (2018, March 6). OHCHR | Surrogacy and the sale of children. OHCHR. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from
Valenti, L. (2018, January 18). Kim Kardashian West Explains Why a Gestational Surrogate Is Not the “Easy Way Out.” Vogue. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from
Van den Akker, O. (2003). Genetic and gestational surrogate mothers’ experience of surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21(2), 145–161.
Van den Akker, O. B. (2006). Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human Reproduction Update, 13(1), 53–62.
Williams, Z., Zepf, D., Longtine, J., Anchan, R., Broadman, B., Missmer, S. A., & Hornstein, M. D. (2009). Foreign fetal cells persist in the maternal circulation. Fertility and Sterility, 91(6), 2593–2595.
Woo, I., Hindoyan, R., Landay, M., Ho, J., Ingles, S. A., McGinnis, L. K., Paulson, R. J., & Chung, K. (2017). Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects. Fertility and Sterility, 108(6), 993–998.
Yau, A., Friedlander, R. L., Petrini, A., Holt, M. C., White, D. E., Shin, J., Kalantry, S., & Spandorfer, S. (2021). Medical and mental health implications of gestational surrogacy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 225(3), 264–269.
Yee, S., Goodman, C. V., & Librach, C. L. (2019). Determinants of gestational surrogates’ satisfaction in relation to the characteristics of surrogacy cases. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 39(2), 249–261.
Yee, S., Hemalal, S., & Librach, C. L. (2020). “Not my child to give away”: A qualitative analysis of gestational surrogates’ experiences. Women and Birth, 33(3), e256–e265.
Голинський Є. & Погоріленко А. (2020). Проект Закону «Про внесення змін до деяких законодавчих актів України щодо запобігання торгівлі людьми». // Golinsky E. & Pogorilenko A. (2020). Draft Law "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Prevention of Trafficking in Human Beings".
Гридковець, Л. М. (2016). Світ життєвих криз людини як дитини своєї сім’ї, свого роду та народу: монографія. Львів. // Gridkovets, L. M. (2016). The world of life crises of a person as a child of his family, family and people: a monograph. Lviv.
How to Cite
Pohorilenko, A. (2021). Psychological component of surrogate motherhood in the light of commodity market development. Herald of Kyiv Institute of Business and Technology, 48(2), 52-57.