PECULIARITIES OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION OF PERSONS OF DIFFERENT PSYCHOTYPES IN ETHNOPSYCHOLOGY USING MATHEMATICAL METHODS
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of intercultural communication in the context of ethnopsychology and its importance for the modern multicultural world. The purpose of the study is to study the peculiarities of intercultural communication of individuals of different psychotypes in ethnopsychology using mathematical methods. The following theoretical and empirical methods of cognition were used in the study, including synthesis, analysis etc. The study found that effective communication between representatives of different cultures is becoming increasingly important in the context of globalisation, but requires an understanding of psychological identities and overcoming cultural differences. The article examines the historical aspect of intercultural interaction, which demonstrates that ethnic differences have often complicated understanding. The article emphasises the role of science, in particular ethnopsychology, conflict and communication psychology, in establishing effective intercultural communication. Particular attention is paid to the use of mathematical methods to analyse psychotypes and cultural characteristics, which contributes to a rational approach to building a dialogue. The article relies on theoretical and empirical methods (analysis, synthesis, modelling, etc.) and scientific concepts, in particular the Seven Dimensions of Culture model by Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner, to explain cultural differences in behaviour and negotiation.
The integration of scientific knowledge – in particular, from ethnopsychology, conflict psychology, and communication psychology – together with the application of mathematical methods provides a rational basis for the analysis of psychotypes and cultural characteristics, which contributes to the development of more effective communication strategies. The study demonstrates that overcoming cultural barriers is necessary for civilizational progress. After all, intercultural communication, based on mutual understanding and supported by scientific approaches, is indispensable for solving global challenges and contributing to the evolutionary development of humanity.
References
2. Beuermann, C., Baker, P., Beutel, J., Pollock, R., & Wehnert, T. (2020). Toolkit Guidance on the governance of environmental rehabilitation and repurposing in coal regions in transition Environmental rehabilitation and repurposing. European Comm, 30.
3. Blyzniuk, T. (2017). Kros-kulturni osoblyvosti menedzhmentu suchasnoi multynatsionalnoi orhanizatsii: monohrafiia. FOP Liburkina L.M. [in Ukrainian]
4. Boutilier, R. G. (2021). From metaphor to political spin: Understanding criticisms of the social licence. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(2). 100743.
5. Hall, E. T. (1984). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Anchor.
6. Hitch, M., & Barakos, G. (2021). Virtuous natural resource development: the evolution and adaptation of social licence in the mining sector. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(2), 100902.
7. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
8. Kokarevich, M., Sizova, N., (2015). Model of Tolerance of Intercultural Communication, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166. 621-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.584.
9. Kozan, M.K. (1989). Cultural influences on styles of handling interpersonal conflicts: comparisons among Jordanian, Turkish, and U.S. Managers Hum. Relat., 42. 787-799. 10.1177/001872678904200903
10. Medvedeva, N. (2014). Teoriia arkhetypiv K.H. Yunha ta doslidzhennia tvorchoho spryimannia Symbolic and archetypicin culture and social relations: material softhe IV international scientific conferense. 21-30. [in Ukrainian]
11. Norenko, I. (2025). Formuvannia multykulturnoi ta sotsialnoi tolerantnosti maibutnikh vykladachiv psykholohii u protsesi mahisterskoi pidhotovky: dysertatsiia. https://ir.duan.edu.ua/handle/123456789/5553 [in Ukrainian]
12. Rodolaki, Ch., Barakos, G., Hitch, M. (2023). The role of intercultural differences and challenges faced in negotiating active mine sites'rehabilitation objectives from Africa to Europe. The Extractive Industries and Society, 16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101362. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2300151X
13. Rothlauf, J., (2014). A global view on intercultural management: challenges in a globalized world.
14. Sobiatinska, L. (2017). Problema psykhotypu liudyny v riznykh haluziakh nauk. Materialy studentskykh naukovykh chytan: zb. prats, 2. 177-185. [in Ukrainian]
15. Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business, Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd, London.
16. Vakal, Yu. (2018). Pro vyvchennia i vykorystannia metodiv matematychnoi statystychnoi dlia analizu rezultativ pedahohichnykh doslidzhen maibutnimy naukovtsiamy. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia Pedahohichni nauky, 13. 62-73. [in Ukrainian]
17. Zahnitko, A. (2020). Movni psykhotypy osobystosti: typolohiia tekstovykh linhvopersonolohiinykh vymiriv. Osobystisni ta sytuatyvni determinanty zdorovia. Materialy V Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konferentsii: materialy i tezy dopovidei. 52-55. [in Ukrainian]
