The Development of the Thinking Culture of the Students in Pre-Higher and Higher Education in a Digital Education Environment: a Psychodiagnostic Assessment
Abstract
The article explores the development of students’ thinking culture within the context of a digital educational environment in professional pre-higher and higher education. The study provides a theoretical interpretation of the concepts of the digital educational environment and students’ thinking culture and clarifies their structural characteristics. The digital educational environment is viewed as a complex educational system that integrates electronic learning resources, distance learning courses, digital technologies, professional communities, individualized learning, blended learning, and active teaching methods. Students’ thinking culture is conceptualized as a multidimensional structure that includes motivational, cognitive, and social domains, each comprising meaningful, operational, and personal-value components. The study presents the results of a psychodiagnostic assessment of the level of development of students’ thinking culture under conditions of digital learning. The findings demonstrate positive changes primarily in the motivational and cognitive domains, including increased achievement motivation, development of creative thinking, personal and intellectual reflection, and improved abilities for self-regulation and self-management. At the same time, communicative competencies, particularly public speaking skills, showed no significant improvement, which indicates certain limitations of learning exclusively within digital educational environments. The results highlight the potential of digital educational environments for fostering intellectual and personal development while emphasizing the importance of improving pedagogical strategies that support the development of students’ communicative and social competencies.
References
Dwyer, C.P., Campbell, D. & Seery, N. (2025). An evaluation of the relationship between critical thinking and creative thinking: Complementary metacognitive processes or strange bedfellows? Journal of Intelligence, 13(2). 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020023
Ersoy, E. & Kara, D.Ö. (2026). The effect of the creative problem-solving approach on creative thinking skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. 1734855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1734855
Liu, Z., Yu, H., Feng, M. & Hou, Y. (2023). Thinking styles and creativity: The mediating role of psychological adjustment in college students. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10). 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100875
Mykhalchuk, N., Ivashkevych, E., Gron, L. & Nikolaichuk, H. (2024). Innovative ways of using video resources in developing students’ creative thinking during online education in the conditions of war in Ukraine. Innovatyka u vykhovanni, 19. 59-69. https://doi.org/10.35619/iiu.v1i19.598
Mykhalchuk, N., Ivashkevych, E., & Chala, Yu. (2024). The problem of professionally significant experience in contemporary psychology. Psykholohiia: realnist i perspektyvy, 22. 69-77. https://doi.org/10.35619/prap_rv.v1i22.368
Mykhalchuk, N.O. & Ivashkevych, E.Z. (2024). Compliment as an existence of speech etiquette: Linguistic and cultural aspect. Naukovi zapysky NU «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Filolohiia, 21. 25-30. DOI: 10.25264/2519-2558-2024-21(89)-25-30
Mykhalchuk N., Ivashkevych, E. & Liashenko, L. (2024). Main linguistic characteristics of the concept PREDICANIVENESS. Akademichni studii. Seriia: Humanitarni nauky, 1. 100-108.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52726/as.humanities/2024.1.16
Mykhalchuk, N. & Komarnitska, L. (2023). The ways of development of students’ creative thinking by actualizing their auditory differential sensation. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii, 61. 74-95. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-61.74-95
Mykhalchuk, N., Koval, I. (2024). Psychological functions of socio-cultural competence. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii, 63. 219-241. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2024-63.219-241
Park, J.H., Li, Y. & Niu, W. (2023). Revisiting creativity and critical thinking through content analysis. Journal of Creativity, 33(2). 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100056
Pavlova, N.S. (2024). Tsyfrove osvitnie seredovyshche u konteksti tsyfrovizatsii osvity. VI nauk.-teor. konf. «Scientific Method: Reality and Future Trends of Researching». Zahreb (Khorvatiia). URL: https://previous.scientia.report/ index.php/archive/article/view/1988 [in Ukrainian]
Peng, Q., Ma, Y., Zhang, L. & Zhou, R. (2025). The impact of brain science literacy on creative thinking: A meta-analytic study. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1637506
Rawlings, B.S. & Cutting, S.J. (2024). Linking disparate strands: A critical review of the relationship between creativity and education. Educational Psychology Review, 36. 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09973-z
Sari, T.N.I. & Rakhmawati, A. (2024). Analysis of the quality of critical thinking and creativity questions in high school biology subjects with the Rasch model. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(1). 602-616. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32758
Shaber, N., Shah, S.K., Imran, M., Almusharraf, N. (2025). Exploring the relationship between critical thinking and creativity in university students: Gender differences and the assessment of skills. Education Sciences, 15(4). 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040464
Storonska, O.S. (2024). Pryntsypy pobudovy suchasnoho tsyfrovoho osvitnoho seredovyshcha. Akademichni vizii, 27. URL: https://academy-vision.org/index.php/ av/article/view/779 [in Ukrainian]
Tlumachnyi slovnyk z informatyky (2010) / H.H. Pivniak, B.S. Busyhin, M.M. Diviziniuk ta in. Nats. hirnych. un-t. [in Ukrainian]
Verovkina, O.Ye. (2010). Psykholohichni chynnyky formuvannia myslennievoi kultury pidlitkiv: dys. … kand. psykhol. nauk: 19.00.07 – pedahohichna ta vikova psykholohiia. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]
Verovkina, O., Simko, A., Zavatska, N. (2025). Psychological Ways of the Development of Different Types of Thinking of Students as Their Soft Skills. Zb. nauk. pr. «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii», 65. 9-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2025-65.9-30



