ІНТЕГРАЦІЯ ЛОГІКИ ТА ПСИХОЛОГІЇ У ДОСЛІДЖЕННІ МІЖКУЛЬТУРНИХ АСПЕКТІВ СПІЛКУВАННЯ ОСОБИСТОСТІ
Ключові слова:
психологія особистості, етнопсихологія, психологія спілкування, логіка, культурологія, експериментальні дослідження
Анотація
У статті проаналізовано проблему ефективної міжкультурної комунікації в умовах глобалізації, де культурні бар'єри стираються, однак зберігаються стереотипи, мовні звички та фізіологічно закріплені реакції, що призводять до непорозумінь і зриву співпраці. Глобалізацію висвітлено мережею зв'язків, вимірювану індексами. Виснувано, що логіка створює універсальні повідомлення для онлайн-діалогів, бізнес-переговорів, роботи з біженцями, а психологія посилює порозуміння, сприяючи глобальному об'єднанню.
Посилання
1. Chin, Y.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Caputo, A., & Hu, C.-F. (2024). Editorial: Understanding cross-cultural differences through cognition and perception analysis: Integrating neuroscience and cultural psychology, II. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. 1416853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416853
2. Chin, Y.-C., Yang, Q., & Lu, Y. (2020). Fear-free cross-cultural communication: Toward a more balanced approach with insight from neuroscience. Frontiers in Communication, 5. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00014
3. Clark, W.C. (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World, Environmental globalization. 86-108. Brookings Institution Press.
4. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10). 1091-1110.
5. Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective.
6. Figge, L., & Martens, P. (2014). Globalisation continues: The Maastricht globalisation index revisited and updated. Globalizations, 7731(April). 1-19.
7. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., & Potrafke, N. et al. (2019) The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited. Rev Int Organ, 14. 543-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
8. Kearney, A.T. (2001). Measuring globalization. Foreign Policy, 122. 56-65.
9. Liu, D. (2023). Pragma-dialectical perspective to intercultural discussion as communicative activity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10. 919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02319-0
10. Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Developing intercultural communicative competence in the digital age: A blended learning approach. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(4). 345-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17475759. 2021.191007
11. Martens, P., Caselli, M., De Lombaerde, P., Figge, L., & Scholte, J.A. (2015). New directions in globalization indices. Globalizations, (August). 1-12.
12. Noels, K.A., & Clement, R. (2019). Western and heritage cultural internalizations predict EFL students’ language motivation. Frontiers in Education, 4. 85.
13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.0008
14. Noels, K.A., & Lou, N.M. (2022). A socio-ecological perspective on second language motivation and intercultural communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 863237. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.863237/full
15. Noels, K.A., Vargas Lascano, D.I., & Saumure, K. (2019). The development of self-determination across the language course: Trajectories of motivational change and the dynamic interplay of psychological needs, orientations, and engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4). 821-851.
16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000189
17. Norris, P. (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World, global governance and cosmopolitan citizens. 155-177. Brookings Institution Press.
18. Raab, M., Ruland, M., Schonberger, B., Blossfeld, H.-P., Hofacker, D., Buchholz, S., & Schmelzer, P. (2008). GlobalIndex: A sociological approach to globalization measurement. International Sociology, 23. 596-631.
19. Ting-Toomey, S., & Dorjee, T. (2015). Intercultural and intergroup communication competence: Toward an integrative perspective. Handbook of communication competence. 503-538. De Gruyter Mouton. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303520390
20. van Eemeren, F.H. (2016). Pragmatic factors in the use of argumentation in intercultural communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(2). 123-140.
21. van Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R. (2016). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Argumentation-Analysis-EvaluationPresentation/van-Eemeren-Grootendorst-Snoeck-Henkemans/ p/book/9781138131934
22. van Eemeren, F.H. (2015). The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation. Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation Library, 27. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_35
2. Chin, Y.-C., Yang, Q., & Lu, Y. (2020). Fear-free cross-cultural communication: Toward a more balanced approach with insight from neuroscience. Frontiers in Communication, 5. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00014
3. Clark, W.C. (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World, Environmental globalization. 86-108. Brookings Institution Press.
4. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10). 1091-1110.
5. Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective.
6. Figge, L., & Martens, P. (2014). Globalisation continues: The Maastricht globalisation index revisited and updated. Globalizations, 7731(April). 1-19.
7. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., & Potrafke, N. et al. (2019) The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited. Rev Int Organ, 14. 543-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
8. Kearney, A.T. (2001). Measuring globalization. Foreign Policy, 122. 56-65.
9. Liu, D. (2023). Pragma-dialectical perspective to intercultural discussion as communicative activity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10. 919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02319-0
10. Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Developing intercultural communicative competence in the digital age: A blended learning approach. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(4). 345-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17475759. 2021.191007
11. Martens, P., Caselli, M., De Lombaerde, P., Figge, L., & Scholte, J.A. (2015). New directions in globalization indices. Globalizations, (August). 1-12.
12. Noels, K.A., & Clement, R. (2019). Western and heritage cultural internalizations predict EFL students’ language motivation. Frontiers in Education, 4. 85.
13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.0008
14. Noels, K.A., & Lou, N.M. (2022). A socio-ecological perspective on second language motivation and intercultural communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 863237. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.863237/full
15. Noels, K.A., Vargas Lascano, D.I., & Saumure, K. (2019). The development of self-determination across the language course: Trajectories of motivational change and the dynamic interplay of psychological needs, orientations, and engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4). 821-851.
16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000189
17. Norris, P. (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World, global governance and cosmopolitan citizens. 155-177. Brookings Institution Press.
18. Raab, M., Ruland, M., Schonberger, B., Blossfeld, H.-P., Hofacker, D., Buchholz, S., & Schmelzer, P. (2008). GlobalIndex: A sociological approach to globalization measurement. International Sociology, 23. 596-631.
19. Ting-Toomey, S., & Dorjee, T. (2015). Intercultural and intergroup communication competence: Toward an integrative perspective. Handbook of communication competence. 503-538. De Gruyter Mouton. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303520390
20. van Eemeren, F.H. (2016). Pragmatic factors in the use of argumentation in intercultural communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(2). 123-140.
21. van Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R. (2016). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Argumentation-Analysis-EvaluationPresentation/van-Eemeren-Grootendorst-Snoeck-Henkemans/ p/book/9781138131934
22. van Eemeren, F.H. (2015). The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation. Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation Library, 27. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_35
Опубліковано
2025-09-25
Як цитувати
SOLYANIK, S., & KHLON, O. (2025). ІНТЕГРАЦІЯ ЛОГІКИ ТА ПСИХОЛОГІЇ У ДОСЛІДЖЕННІ МІЖКУЛЬТУРНИХ АСПЕКТІВ СПІЛКУВАННЯ ОСОБИСТОСТІ. Вісник Київського інституту бізнесу та технологій, 53(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.37203/kibit.2025.53(2).10
Розділ
Статьи
